High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/6684/2021dismissed

Annand Maalik v. State Of Haryana And Others

2021-10-07Mrs. Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.115 CRWP No. 6684 of 2021 Date of Decision: 07.10.2021 Annand Maalik

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Virender Soni, Advocate, for the petitioner.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition while submitting that as regards the relief, except the protection of his life and liberty, as sought in the present petition, the petitioner would be availing the appropriate and efficacious remedy, as may be permissible to him under law, for this purpose and so far as his (petitioner's) prayer for the protection of his life and liberty is concerned, he would be moving a fresh representation to respondent No.6-Commissioner of Police, Gurugram, exclusively praying therein for the said protection only and he further prays that respondent No.6 be directed to look into and take appropriate action on the fresh representation of the petitioner within some specific time frame.

Mr. S.S. Pannu, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, who has appeared on behalf of respondents No.1 to 7 in this case, in NEETU RANI 2021.10.07 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC

CRWP No. 6684 of 2021 -2- .....

pursuance of the copies of the instant petition having been sent to the respondent-State in advance, has no objection to the above-discussed submission as well as the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner. Resultantly, the petition in hand stands dismissed for having been withdrawn with a direction to respondent No.6 that in case, the petitioner moves any fresh representation to him restricting his prayer therein to the protection of his life and liberty only, he will look into the same and if the petitioner would be found to be genuinely deserving the said protection, then this respondent shall take appropriate action strictly in accordance with law, in the given set of the facts and circumstances of the matter, preferably within a period of ten days. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) 07.10.2021 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No NEETU RANI 2021.10.07 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC