Om Parkash Sharma v. State Of Haryana And Others
CRM-M-28631-2021 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CRM-M-28631-2021 Date of decision: 26.11.2021 Om Parkash Sharma Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present:
Mr. Bhagwat Dayal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. **** AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (Oral):
Today physical hearing was held but on request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter is taken up by way of hybrid hearing.
This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed seeking directions to the official respondents to take appropriate action on representation dated 24th June, 2021.
Notice of motion was issued to the official respondents. Learned State counsel has sent through electronic medium report of filing of representation, same is taken on record. She, on instructions from SI Raghbir, submits that representation was considered and rejected finding no truth in the allegations. She further submits that no threat apprehension was found. PANKAJ BAWEJA 2021.11.26 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
CRM-M-28631-2021 -2In view of reply filed and statement made, no interference is called for.
The petition is disposed of.
Needless to say that petitioner would always be at liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law for redressal of surviving grievance, if any.
[AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE 26th November, 2021
1. Whether speaking/ reasoned :
Yes /No
2. Whether reportable :
Yes /No PANKAJ BAWEJA 2021.11.26 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh