High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/569/2016disposed of

Gulshan Kumar & ORS v. State Of Punjab & ANR

2016-01-11Mr. Justice S.C. Malte1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No.M-569 of 2016 Date of Decision: January 11, 2016 Gulshan Kumar & Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab & Anr.

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.Ashok Kumar Khunger, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.(Oral) Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if learned Appellate Court where the appeal filed by the petitioners challenging their conviction and sentence is pending, is directed to consider the factum of compromise while deciding the appeal, in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly.

January 11, 2016 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge SEEMA RANI 2016.01.11 17:07 I attest the accuracy and authencity of the document