Jogender v. State Of Haryana And Others

CRM-12997-2020 in/& CRM-A-716-2020 JOGENDER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Present:

Mr. Anurag Arora, Advocate for the applicant-appellant.

Mr. Yuvraj Shandilya, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4.

CRM-12997-2020 Present application has been filed for condonation of delay of 217 days in filing the accompanying appeal.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 217 days in filing the accompanying appeal, is condoned.

CRM-A-716-2020 Learned counsel for the applicant submits that they have a very good case on merit and there is sufficient evidence on record which is sufficient for conviction of respondents. There is no appreciation of evidence in judgment of acquittal dated 12.04.2019.

Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the judgment of acquittal is well reasoned.

Leave to appeal granted.

Registry to assign number to appeal.

Main appeal Heard.

Admitted.

The accused-respondents, to execute a bond for attendance within two months, undertaking to appear in this Court, in case appeal is allowed. JYOTI 2025.12.04 11:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-A-716-2020 -2Given above, the accused-respondents shall furnish a personal bond of Rs. Twenty five Thousand only (INR 25,000/-), and furnishing one surety for Rs. Twenty five thousand only (INR 25,000/-), to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Before accepting the sureties, the concerned Court must satisfy that if the accused fails to appear in Court, then such surety is capable of producing the accused before the Court. The furnishing of the personal bonds shall be deemed acceptance of the all stipulations, terms, and conditions of this bail order. Registry to communicate this order to the trial Court without any delay. In case of failure of respondents to furnish bond, the concerned Court shall proceed further in accordance with law.

There would be no need for a certified copy of this order for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the accused can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and attest it to be a true copy. In case the attesting officer wants to verify the authenticity, such an officer can also verify its authenticity and may download and use the downloaded copy for attesting bonds. It is clarified that pendency of present appeal shall be inconsequential qua the private respondents.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 03.12.2025 jyoti3 JYOTI 2025.12.04 11:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document