Samridhi Goyal v. State Of Punjab Etc

Crl. Misc. No. M-47069 of 2017 (O&M) [ 1 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-47069 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision : January 17, 2018 Samridhi Goyal .............................................................Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ................................. Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL ...

Present:

Mr. Rajinder Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.

...

LISA GILL, J. (Oral) CRM-1382 of 2018 Document Annexure P-36 i.e. order dated 11.12.2017 passed by the Punjab State Commission for Non Resident Indians (NRIs) Chandigarh is taken on record subject to just exceptions. Application is disposed of.

CRM-M-47069 of 2017 This petition has been filed for handing over the investigation of FIR No. 0003 dated 02.03.2017 under Sections 406, 498-A IPC registered at Police Station NRI and Women Wing Bathinda to the Central Bureau of Investigation or to the Crime Branch Punjab as it is stated that no action has been taken against respondents No. 6 to 9 despite directions issued by the Punjab State Commission for NRIs, Chandigarh in complaint No. 1386.

Rupinder Kaur 2018.01.22 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Crl. Misc. No. M-47069 of 2017 (O&M) [ 2 ] Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

It is not in dispute that the petitioner submitted a complaint before the Punjab State Commission for NRIs alleging that FIR No. 0003 dated 02.03.2017 was registered on the basis of her allegations but her inlaws were not being proceeded against. It is further not in dispute that the Punjab State Commission for NRIs is seized of the matter. It is observed in order dated 11.12.2017 that as per report dated 05.12.2017 submitted before the Commission by AIG, Patiala, in-laws of the complainant are now being proceeded against in the above said FIR and further investigation is in progress. The matter is listed before the Commission on 23.01.2018. At this stage, no orders are called for in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Needless to say the petitioner is at liberty to pursue the matter before the Commission and in case her grievance is not redressed she may avail of any remedy/remedies as may be available to her at that stage.

Petition is disposed of.

( LISA GILL ) 17.01.2018 JUDGE rupi Note: Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable:

Yes / No Rupinder Kaur 2018.01.22 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document