High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/6695/2021disposed of

Pooja Sharma And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

2021-07-22Mrs. Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta2 pages

CRWP No.6695 of 2021 ...1...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.114 CRWP No.6695 of 2021 Date of Decision: 22nd July, 2021.

Pooja Sharma & Another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana & Others

...Respondents

(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Balraj Gujjar, Advocate, for the petitioners.

* * * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) By way of this petition, the petitioners have approached this Court for seeking the relief of the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No. 2 to 4 to protect their lives and liberty as they apprehend threat to the same at the hands of respondents No.5 to 7 because they (petitioners) have solemnized their marriage against the wishes of these respondents. It has also been mentioned in this petition that a representation (Annexure P-5) has already been moved to respondent No.2 in this regard. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 4 only. Mr. S.S.Pannu, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, who has joined the proceedings on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 in this case in pursuance of the copies of this petition having SEEMA SHARMA 2021.07.22 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP No.6695 of 2021 ...2...

been sent to the respondent-State in advance, accepts the notice on behalf of these respondents.

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioners restricts his prayer to the issuance of a direction to respondent No.2 to take appropriate action on the said representation of petitioner No.1, i.e Annexure P-5. Learned counsel for the State has no objection for the same.

Keeping in view the above-discussed limited prayer as made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without commenting or expressing any opinion on the legality and validity of the marriage as stated to have been solemnized between the petitioners, respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Charkhi Dadri, is hereby directed to look into the said representation of petitioner No.1 (Annexure P-5) and if it is found that the petitioners genuinely deserve any protection, then to take appropriate action in accordance with law. This petition stands disposed of accordingly. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 22.07.2021.

seema Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No Whether Reportable?

Yes/No SEEMA SHARMA 2021.07.22 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document