Amit Jha And ORS v. State Of Punjab & ORS




    
    

 Date of decision: 31st July, 2015  Amit Jha and others

Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another

Respondents        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Prashant Vashisth, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.

None for respondent No.2.

 !
"#  $ Report dated 02.05.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class (Duty Magistrate), Jalandhar has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Priya and the accused persons namely Anirudh Jha, Amit Jha, Suman and Neelam, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise Ex.PA has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

Heard.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.08.03 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



 

 In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, being a pure matrimonial dispute, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences and for betterment of their future life and in view of the law laid down in %&'(!&()*+!,',-

.(/'0 '(1 '(,*-2  #3$   #2&4&('5$ 36 and %7.58&(1-2 !&()* '(1 ,*-29 + !,',-  .(/'0 '(1 '(,*-2  #6$   #2&4&('5$  " the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.3 dated 05.01.2013 registered at Police Station Bawa Khel, Jalandhar City under Sections 406/498=A/323 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed. The petition stands allowed in those terms.

#  !
$   .5:6 "


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.08.03 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court