Vikash Kumar v. State Of Haryana

In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRM-M-28563-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 17.2.2022 Vikash Kumar ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Vikas Bishnoi Godara, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, DAG, Haryana, assisted by SI Baljeet.

***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral) The petitioner has approached this Court seeking grant of anticipatory bail in respect of a case registered against him vide FIR No. 181, dated 9.7.2018, Police Station Adampur, District Hisar, under Sections 25/54/59 of Arms Act.

Learned State counsel, upon instructions from SI Baljeet, has informed that despite specific directions having been issued by this Court to the petitioner to join investigation, he did not come forward to associate himself with the investigation.

MOHAN SINGH 2022.02.17 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-28563-2021 (O&M) - 2 - Learned counsel for the petitioner could not furnish any justifiable reason for the same.

In view of the aforestated position, wherein the petitioner has chosen not to comply with the directions issued by this Court as regards joining of investigation, he does not deserve any concession of anticipatory bail. The petition, as such, is hereby dismissed. 17.2.2022 (GURVINDER SINGH GILL) mohan JUDGE Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No MOHAN SINGH 2022.02.17 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document