Arun Sharma v. State Of Punjab

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-47454 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.12.2017 Arun Sharma ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shekher Dhawan.

Present:

Mr. Rahul Verma, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Shekher Dhawan, J.

Present petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for seeking pre-arrest bail to the petitioner(s) in case FIR No. 117 dated 30.6.2017, registered under Section(s) 420 IPC at Police Station City Gurdaspur, District Gurdaspur.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that FIR has been recorded on incorrect facts because the petitioner had assured grandson of the complainant a job and he had arranged the job and letter of appointment (Annexure P2) was got issued. But the grandson of the complainant did not join the job and petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Having considered the fact that as per first information report, the amount was received for sending grandson of the complainant abroad and appointment letter (Annexure P2) does not serve the purpose in any way. Moreso, petitioner is involved in a number of cases of similar nature and is Deepak Kumar Bhardwaj 2017.12.14 12:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Criminal Misc. No. M-47454 of 2017 habitual offender. Thus, no case is made out to grant the concession of prearrest bail to the petitioner. Hence, present petition stands dismissed. (Shekher Dhawan) Judge December 13, 2017 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Deepak Kumar Bhardwaj 2017.12.14 12:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document