Santokh Singh And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ANR




    
     

 Date of decision: 6th April, 2015  Santokh Singh and another

Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another

Respondents     !  "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Vinay K. Pandey, Advocate for for Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Navdeep Singh, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab. 

 "
#$ !% As per the report of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jalandhar dated 23.03.2015, Pardeep Singh complainant along with Santokh Singh and Tejinder Pal Singh accused have affected compromise out of their free will and without any coercion or undue pressure.

Keeping in view the satisfaction shown by the Court below and in the light of the fact that compromise will go a long way in resolving the personal dispute and to bring about amity and goodwill in RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.04.08 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   the society coupled with the fact that offences are not of serious nature, the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.66 dated 10.07.2014 registered at Police Station Lambra, District Jalandhar under Sections 457, 380 IPC and all consequences arising thereof are quashed.

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

$  "
%   &'()# 


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.04.08 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court