Vikas v. State Of Haryana

Crl. Misc. No. M-48457 of 2018 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-48457 of 2018 Date of Decision: 13.11.2018 Vikas ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Rahul Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J The petitioner is seeking regular bail in FIR No. 834 dated 18.8.2018 registered at Police Station Chandnibagh, District Panipat under Sections 342, 354, 376, 506, 34 IPC and Section 3 of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the FIR has been lodged after a delay of four days and there are no allegations of rape against the petitioner and the victim has been changing her statement and challan has already been presented and the main accused is Dilip against whom allegations of rape had been made. The counsel further submits that the prosecutrix is major.

Investigation is over. The allegations of rape are against Dilip. There are no allegations of rape against the petitioner. The prosecutrix is said to have gone with the petitioner on his motor cycle. The allegations are GURPREET SINGH 2018.11.14 09:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-48457 of 2018 -2that the petitioner had flirted with her and had molested her. The trial would take time. Without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE November 13, 2018 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No GURPREET SINGH 2018.11.14 09:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh