Anjali Sandhu@Manno v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No. M-48494 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision : February 07, 2019 Anjali Sandhu @ Manno ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ....Respondent Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh Present :

Ms Puja Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Baljinder Virk, DAG, Haryana for the State Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral) Learned State Counsel, on instructions from Inspector Sunita, PS Sector-5, Panchkula submits that the petitioner has since joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigations and nothing is to be recovered from her and that he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute.

In the light of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 1.11.2018 is made absolute till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The petitioner shall abide by the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

With these observations, the present petition stands disposed off. ( Fateh Deep Singh ) February 07, 2019 Judge 'tiwana'

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No Whether Reportable ?

Yes/No DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2019.02.07 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.