Manisha And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

CRM-M No.47710 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.47710 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 14.12.2017 ...

Manisha and another ................Petitioners vs.

State of Haryana and others .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Petitioners in person with Mr. Dishant D. Tuteja, Advocate.

...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) It is contended that petitioner No.1 - Manisha, aged about 20 years has got married with petitioner No.2- Ramu Rohilla, aged about 30 years, against the wishes of her maternal aunt, arrayed as private respondent No. 4, who is threatening to interfere in their marital life, as such to seek protection in that regard, the petitioners have approached this Court by way of filing the present petition. The petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 - Superintendent of Police, Panipat, to look into the grievances Banita Chugh 2017.12.14 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M No.47710 of 2017 -2of the petitioners and to take necessary measures to ensure that lives and liberty of the petitioners are not jeopardized at the hands of respondent No. 4 to 6 or persons claiming under her. However, this order shall not validate the marriage between the petitioners and shall not have any effect on any civil or criminal action to which the petitioners may be found liable, under the law. ( H.S. Madaan ) Judge 14.12.2017 chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No Banita Chugh 2017.12.14 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh