Raj Kumar And Others v. State Of Haryana And Another

CRM-M-48648-2018 -12023:PHHC:133981

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-48648-2018 Date of Decision: 13.10.2023 Raj Kumar and others .... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. Rajat Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Sushil Sehoran, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Deepshikha Chauhan, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Rajesh Dhankar, Advocate for respondent No. 2. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of FIR No. 380 dated 19.09.2018 (Annexure P-2) registered under Sections 323, 406, 498-A and 506 IPC at Police Station Badhra, District Charkhi Dadri and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom.

At the outset, learned counsel for the State submits that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous as in the present case, after completion of investigation, the police had prepared the cancellation report on 09.11.2018 and presented the same before the trial Court on 07.03.2020. The said cancellation report was accepted by the learned trial Court on 24.08.2022. This fact has also been mentioned in para RISHU KATARIA 2023.10.17 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-48648-2018 -22023:PHHC:133981 No. 3 of the preliminary submissions of the reply dated 04.10.2023, filed by way of affidavit of Sh. Desh Raj, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Badhra, District Charkhi Dadri, on behalf of respondent No. 1State of Haryana. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the above-stated facts.

In view of the above, no further direction is warranted in the present case and the same is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

13.10.2023 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2023.10.17 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment