Satyavrat Dahiya v. State Of Haryana And Another

CRM-M No.48705 of 2018 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.48705 of 2018 Date of Decision:17.01.2020 Satyavrat Dahiya

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR Present:- Mr. Bijender Dhankar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

-.- JAISHREE THAKUR J. (ORAL) 1.

This is a petition that has been filed for quashing of FIR No.104 dated 06.07.2017 under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 and 506 IPC registered at Women Police Station, Rohtak.

2.

Pursuant to notice of motion issued, reply by way of affidavit of Sushila, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police (Women), Rohtak has been filed in which it has been stated that the matter has been investigated thoroughly and it has been found that the matter stands compromised. In the reply, it has further been stated that respondent No.2 has filed an affidavit wherein she has submitted that she has received an amount of `23 lakhs as permanent alimony and has withdrawn all the allegations made against the petitioner.

3.

Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that a cancellation report has been prepared on 20.02.2019 and the same will be filed in Court after obtaining necessary approvals. 4.

Consequently, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press PANKAJ KUMAR 2020.01.21 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.48705 of 2018 -2the instant petition keeping his option open to have the same revived in case the cancellation report is not accepted.

5.

Dismissed as not pressed at this stage.

(JAISHREE THAKUR) JUDGE January 17, 2020 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PANKAJ KUMAR 2020.01.21 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document