Reenakshi Yadav v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P 13083 of 2019 Date of decision : 17.05.2019 Reenakshi Yadav ......Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Vijay Pal, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) The petitioner is NET qualified and worked as Extension Lecturer (Commerce) in Government College Gurugram (P-2) and was relieved due to non availability of workload. Petitioner is now seeking that she may be re-engaged keeping in view the workload and vacancy in the College. The grievance of the petitioner is that she has given a representation dated 09.05.2019 (Annexure P-4) stating therein that she be allowed to join as workload is still available in the Government College Faridabad which is mentioned at Sr. No. 110, in letter dated 28.01.2019 (P-3).

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is being disposed of by giving direction to respondents No. 3 to look into representation dated 09.05.2019 (Annexure P-4) and adjust the petitioner on vacant post in the College mentioned at Sr. No. 110 of the letter dated 28.01.2019 (Annexure P-3), keeping in view judgment passed in CWP No. 16954-2015 tilted as Anurag Chahal and others vs. State of Haryana and another.

May 17, 2019 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Gaurav Arora 2019.06.03 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh