Saijal And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRWP-4369-2026 Date of decision: 18.04.2026 Date of uploading: 18.04.2026 Saijal and another ....Petitioners V/s State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

Present:

Dr. Kirandeep Kaur, Advocate for Ms. Anjum Hussain, Advocate for the petitioners. ***** SUMEET GOEL, J.

1.

By way of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners are seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect their life and liberty at the hands of respondent Nos.4 & 5.

2.

Notice of motion.

3.

On the asking of the Court, Ms. Priyanka Sadar, Sr. DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents No.1 to 3. 4.

As per the petitioners, they have married on 14.04.2026 against the wishes of respondent Nos. Nos.4 & 5, who happen to be the family members/relative of the petitioners.

6.

Both the petitioners have claimed themselves to be major relying upon their Aadhar Cards indicating that date of birth of petitioner No.1-Saijal is 01.04.2006 and petitioner No.2-Mukesh is 01.01.2001. NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.04.18 12:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh

CRWP-4369-2026 P a g e | 2 7.

Without commenting on the legality and validity of the marriage as also the merits of contentions raised in the petition, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2 (Superintendent of Police, Nuh) to look into the representation dated 14.04.2026 (Annexure P-4) stated to have been submitted by the petitioners & pass appropriate orders thereupon within two weeks from today.

8.

Liberty is reserved in favour of private respondents to seek recall of this order on showing sufficient cause. 9.

However, if the petitioners are found to have been involved in any other case, then this order shall not preclude the competent authority from taking lawful action against the petitioners. 10.

The petition stands disposed off. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off.

(SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE 18.04.2026 Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.04.18 12:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh