← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCR/3473/2026disposed of

Gurudwara Patshahi Shemi v. Baba Bhai Roop Chand Langar Sewa Sewa Society

2026-04-23Mr. Justice Amarinder Singh Grewal2 pages

CR-3473-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (125) CR-3473-2026 Date of Decision:-23.04.2026 Gurudwara Patshahi Shemi, Bhai Rupa, District Bhatinda ......Petitioner

Versus

Baba Bhai Roop Chand Langer Sewa Society ......Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL ****

Present:

Mr. Gurmohan Singh Bedi, Advocate, and Mr. Pawandeep Singh, Advocate, and Ms. Ambika Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

**** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) 1.

The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking setting aside of the impugned order dated 20.03.2026 (Annexure P-1), passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Bathinda, whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 27.01.2026 (Annexure P-4), passed by the learned trial Court, has been dismissed.

2.

Briefly stated, the facts are that the petitioner-plaintiff instituted a suit for permanent injunction. Along with the suit, an application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC was also filed. Vide order dated 27.01.2026 (Annexure P-3), the learned trial Court declined the prayer for grant of ad interim injunction. Aggrieved against the same, the petitioner preferred an appeal, which also came to be -1SHUBHAM 2026.04.24 16:43 I am the author of this document

CR-3473-2026 dismissed by the learned First Appellate Court vide order dated 20.03.2026. Hence, the present petition.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the limited prayer in the present revision petition is for issuance of a direction to the learned trial Court to decide the application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC on merits within a time-bound manner, as the petitioner has valuable rights which require expeditious adjudication. 4.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have perused the paper book.

5.

Considering the limited nature of the relief sought, issuance of notice to the respondent is dispensed with, as the same would only result in delay of the proceedings.

6.

In view of the aforesaid submissions, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned trial Court to decide the application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, after taking reply, if any.

7.

The Registry is directed to forward a copy of this order to the learned trial Court, Bathinda, for compliance. (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 23.04.2026 Shubham Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No -2SHUBHAM 2026.04.24 16:43 I am the author of this document