Tanu Jolly Through Her Husband & Another v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-48783-2018 DATE OF DECISION:-01.12.2018 TANU JOLLY AND ANR.

...PETITIONERS...

V.

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

...RESPONDENTS...

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN

Present:

None for the petitioners.

**** RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) By circulating written request, learned counsel for the petitioners has sought adjournment.

No justification, inasmuch as, on the previous date also, this petition was adjourned for today on request of learned counsel for the petitioners.

This is a protection petition. Seeking adjournment one after the other repeatedly, shows that the petitioners do not need any immediate protection.

Dismissed.

01.12.2018 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No whether reportable:

Yes/No SONIKA 2018.12.03 17:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh