Sukhjit Singh v. State Of Ut Chandigarh And Another
!
SUKHJIT SINGH
"
STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER .
# $ %&$ '( ' )
!
"# $
%& ''''' ( ' ) * "+, ( $) *
# +,&
# #* (-./
1##23 !
4
56%78 979+&9&&
/,9 /+
6 # (,790
16#23
/7 # 0
: ;(3
4
*
! * * (-98&9&&0
: ;&3
!
<
-2- & <
!
# =64
9797&9&&
*
* * !
<
< /
!
*
>
5
#
# * % &+9 &/97&9&&"
:
;
!
"
# $
%
"!#&
# $
'
(
'
(
" ) + ?
*
* * *
) !
*
-38 $
!
%&
*
56
4
! 4
7 5$
*
!
""
#
$ %
!
!
*+,
- % .,+
- ( -
/
- / /
/
+0 # & '
(
'
& '
) '* 1 * 2 # 3
) 56
#
%
-
%
-4- 578
5+60
- ( - .,+
- ( -
5+
9
#
.,+
- ( -
/
/ :
;
- % .,+
- ( -
%
55
- ( -
- .,+ !
-
9
;
5+6
- ( -
5. .,+
- ( - % <%;: 3
- %
; 1 - %
#
-5- .,+
- ( -
1 1 - %
%
- % ;
-
;
&
-
. < 4
*
<
!)
@ A! * #
*
'Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and another,(2012)10 SCC303'. Still further, the broad principles for exercising the powers under Section 482 were summarized by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of 'Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others versus State of Gujarat and another" (2017) 9 SCC 641'. 8.
<
*!
*
< ! !)
"
) ! <
*
! - @ A! * #
*
A"# + , , -
& *
$
)
.!/0
*
< ! B
*
<
:
!
-6- *
)**
4
< < !
# 4
56 <
*
*
!
@ A! * # :
;
19. We thus sum-up and hold that as opposed to Section 320 Cr.P.C. where the Court is squarely guided by the compromise between the parties in respect of offences 'compoundable' within the statutory framework, the extraordinary power enjoined upon a High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or vested in this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution, can be invoked beyond the metes and bounds of Section 320 Cr.P.C. Nonetheless, we reiterate that such powers of wide amplitude ought to be exercised carefully in the context of quashing criminal proceedings, bearing in mind: (i) Nature and effect of the offence on the conscious of the society; (ii) Seriousness of the injury, if any; (iii) Voluntary nature of compromise between the accused and the victim; & (iv) Conduct of the accused persons, prior to and after the occurrence of the purported offence and/or other relevant considerations.
(9 "
<
* *
<
!
4
*
*
< +,&## ; 3
) !
<
"
C *
3
/&)
*
<
!
<
<
-7- 3
56<
) &9&& !
) iv)
4
! !
< !
) ! 6 ! *
v) #
*
) !;
) !
vi)
) ) <
3 % ! <! !)
D viii)
)*
) *
)
56 ix) *
)
#
) ! <
* "
! < < <
) ; :
* ) 11.
In view of the report of the >
5
#
# a
< !)
: # 1
-'
$
$
! ! < "# + , , -
&
$
)
-8-
.!/ !)
5$
-'
*
!
""
#
$ %
< "
FIR No. 65 dated 06.04.2022 under Sections 380 and 34 of the IPC registered at Police Station Sector 36, Chandigarh (Annexure P-1) and all other consequential proceedings arising there from"-"./01-4
< * * dated 19.05.2022 (Annexure P-2) However, the same would be subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- to be deposited by the petitioner with the "Legal Service Authority, U.T. Chandigarh", within one month from receipt of certified copy of this order.
< *( ' ), & 2
= E
= F =% E
! F =%