High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/48908/2018dismissed

Karaj Singh v. State Of Punjab

2018-11-02Lok Adalat Bench - 12 pages

CRM-M-48908 of 2018 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-48908 of 2018 DECIDED ON: November 02, 2018 KARAJ SINGH ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: Mr. Rishu Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in case, FIR No.172 dated 26.08.2018, registered under Sections 323, 324, 326, 341, 506, 148 and 149 IPC, Police Station Lapoke, Amritsar. According to the prosecution, in the evening of 08.06.2018, the petitioner and his daughter-Daljit Kaur along with their accomplice Ranjit Kaur in a pre-planned manner caused repeated injuries with swords to the complainant and his daughter Amritpal Kaur, which were declared grievous in nature.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the instant case by concocting a false story. In fact, the petitioner and his family are working in the fields of Gursahib Singh, real brother of the complainant. The complainant asked the petitioner not to work in the fields of his brother Gursahib SONIKA 2018.11.13 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-48908 of 2018 --2-- Singh. The petitioner did not budge to his said illegal command. Therefore, the complainant caused injuries to the petitioner and lodged the instant false case against him. Gursahib Singh, employer of the petitioner, had also obtained stay against the complainant from Civil Court.

Having given anxious consideration to the submission and perusing the impugned order of the Sessions Judge dated 23.10.2018, this Court finds that the same is perfectly legal. The co-accused and daughter of the petitioner Daljit Kaur have been granted concession of anticipatory bail by the Sessions Court, inasmuch as they had been attributed simple injury. Since, petitioner has caused grievous injury to the complainant and his daughter, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail was declined.

There is no scope to differ with the above findings recorded by the Sessions Court.

Consequently, the petition is dismissed.

November 02, 2018 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SONIKA 2018.11.13 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh