Munsab Ali v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-23579 of 2020 {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-23579 of 2020 Date of decision:18.01.2021 Munsab Ali ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Amjad Khan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, DAG, Haryana.

SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) The Court has been convened through video conferencing due to Covid-19 pandemic.

Through the instant petition, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.0190 dated 09.07.2020 registered under Sections 379-A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short "IPC") at P.S.DLF PH-3rd, District Gurugram.

Counsel for the State submits that Section 379-A of IPC has been deleted and Sections 379 and 420 of IPC have been incorporated in the FIR.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Sandeep submits that the petitioner has re-joined investigation and is no longer SAVITA KADIAN 2021.01.18 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-23579 of 2020 {2} required for custodial interrogation. The petitioner is not involved in any other criminal case.

In view of the above facts, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 20.08.2020 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE January 18, 2021 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAVITA KADIAN 2021.01.18 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh