High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/6745/2016allowed

Rahul v. State Of Haryana

2016-08-19Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

CRM-M-6745-2016 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-6745-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 19.08.2016 Rahul ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. K.D.S. Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate for the respondent.

**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in a case arising out of FIR No.1219 dated 24.12.2015, registered at Police Station City Karnal, District Karnal, who has been booked for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 354, 427, 448, 452, 365, 511 and 506 IPC. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from investigating officer, states that in compliance of order dated 10.05.2016, passed by this Court, the petitioner has again joined the investigation and the vehicle in question has been recovered from him. At this stage, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Naresh Kumar 2016.08.23 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-6745-2016 (O&M) -2In view of the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 25.02.2016, by this Court whereby the ad-interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. August 19, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2016.08.23 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh