Mukesh Garg & ANR v. Rajesh Malik

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-7913 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 27, 2019 Dr. Mukesh Garg and another ..........PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

Dr. Rajesh Malik ........RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Munish Kumar Garg, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Dr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Senior Advocate with Mr. G.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate and Mr. Dushyant Sarvesh, Advocate for the respondent.

Ms. Dimple Jain, A.A.G. Haryana.

Mr. Sumeet Goel, standing counsel for Central Bureau of Investigation.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition as the same has been rendered infructuous on decision of the complaint.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

Learned counsel representing CBI submits that in the report of CBI, certain anomalies in functioning of University were mentioned, as such, permission be given to CBI to look into the same and proceed further, as required.

CBI/University Authorities will be at liberty to proceed further in such matter as required under law.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) November 27, 2019 JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No SACHIN MEHTA 2019.11.27 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh