Gurdarshan Singh & ORS v. Ramesh Kumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8063-2014 DATE OF DECISION:-05.03.2019 GURDARSHAN SINGH AND ORS.

...PETITIONERS...

V.

RAMESH KUMAR ...RESPONDENT...

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: Mr. APS Deol, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vishal R. Lamba, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Akshay Jain, Advocate for the respondent. **** RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Instant petition is pending since the year 2014 and the trial is unnecessarily held up on account of stay of the proceedings. Heard.

The matter requires appreciation of evidence. Therefore, impugned complaint (Annexure P-8) cannot be quashed in a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. without appreciating the evidence. The trial is at the fag end and thus, would be concluded shortly. Therefore, in the fitness of things, petitioners are relegated to trial court with liberty to raise all the pleas, which have been raised in the instant petition at appropriate stage.

Disposed of as such.

05.03.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No whether reportable:

Yes/No SONIKA 2019.03.08 06:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh