Murli v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-48165-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-48165 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 21, 2017.

Murli ..........PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Haryana ........RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Susheel Gautam, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 100 dated 26.07.2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341 379-B and 506 of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Quilla Panipat, District Panipat.

Heard.

Notice of motion.

On asking of the court, Mr. Deepak Grewal, DAG, Haryana, who is present in the Court accepts notice and submits that intimation by Registry informing of fixation of the petition has already been received and record of the case is available with him.

As per allegations in the FIR, complainant was going on his Activa to the office of his friend when the petitioner along with his friend stopped him and caused beatings to the complainant. He also removed the keys of his Activa and `25,500/- from the pocket of complainant. Petitioner Sachin Mehta 2017.12.21 12:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-48165-2017 -2brought a lathi and caused injuries to the complainant and dragged him towards the street when a friend of complainant happened to pass from there and the petitioner along with his friend ran away from the spot. Learned State counsel submits that after completion of investigation, challan against the petitioner has been presented in Court. As per medical report of the complainant, there were bruises/simple injuries on his person. The police has not recovered the keys of Activa and currency notes of complainant from the petitioner, however, lathi used in the occurrence has been recovered.

Keeping in view the above facts and that conclusion of trial will take considerable long time but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner Murli is ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, subject to following terms:- a. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

b. In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the benefit of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand withdrawn. The trial Court shall be competent to cancel his bail bond and surety bond and proceed to procure his presence in accordance with law. In that eventuality the petitioner shall have to apply for bail afresh.

c. He shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the Court.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) December 21, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.12.21 12:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH