Sahil Bagga And ORS v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M 6868/2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision:12.04.2016 Sahil Bagga and others .............Petitioners v.

State of Punjab .............Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr.Amitoj Singh Dhaliwa,Advocate for the petitioners Mr.Kirat Singh Sidhu,DAG Punjab with HC Gurmail Singh Ms.JS Jaidka,Advocate for the complainant.

Jaswant Singh,J.(Oral) Prayer is for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of four petitioners, who are family members and neighbours of the complainant, in case FIR No.29 dated 5.2.2016 under Sections 323, 452, 506, 1438,149 IPC, PS Jodhewal, Ludhiana. On account of a scratch on the car of the accused party by a delivery van used by the complainant, an altercation appears to have erupted leading to inflicting injuries on the complainant by the accused party.

It is contended that except the offence under Section 452 IPC, rest of the offences are bailable in nature. Be that as it may, counsel for the petitioners submits that his clients are ready for an amicable settlement with the complainant. On the last date of hearing,learned counsel for the complainant had put in appearance and stated that complainant was not RAJINDER PRASHAD JOSHI 2016.04.13 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh.

CRM-M 6868/2016 averse for effecting an amicable settlement between the neighbours. At the time of hearing today,learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties are neighbours and have amicably settled their dispute vide written compromise dated 18.3.2016. Learned counsel for the complainant and learned State counsel on instructions acknowledge the fact of compromise. In view of the above,interim bail granted vide order dated 26.2.2016 is made absolute.

Disposed of.

12.04.2016 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge RAJINDER PRASHAD JOSHI 2016.04.13 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh.