Baljit Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

CWP-11407-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11407-2024 Date of Decision : 16.05.2024 BALJIT SINGH ... PETITIONER

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

Ms. Simranjot S.Nagra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to count his service rendered as Special Police Officer for qualifying service for the purpose of pensionary/retiral benefits. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in Harbans Lal Vs. State of Punjab (CWP No.2371 of 2010). 3.

Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab who on advance notice is present in Court submits that in terms of above stated judgment of this Court, the respondents authorities in the case of various officials have Anju Goel 2024.05.16 15:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-11407-2024 considered their claim and passed orders. He further asserts that appropriate authority would consider case of the petitioner in terms of judgments of this Court in Harbans Lal (supra) and pass an appropriate order within 3 months from today.

4.

In the wake of statements of both side, the present petition stands disposed of.

( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) JUDGE 16.05.2024 anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Anju Goel 2024.05.16 15:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh