Harvinder Singh Alias Bhundi Alias Binder v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M-21681-2025 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21681-2025 Date of Decision: 30.04.2025 HARVINDER SINGH @ BHUNDI @ BINDER ... PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB ... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab.

H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) 1.

This is a petition for regular bail filed under Section 483 BNSS in case FIR No. 149 dated 22.09.2024 under Sections 109, 115(2), 190, 191(3), 332 (C), 333, 117 (1) of BNS, 2023 at Police Station Garhshankar, District Hoshiarpur Punjab.

2.

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with co-accused had given injuries to the complainant and the petitioner with a gandasa had given a blow which hit the forehead of the complainant. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and is in custody since 10.10.2024. 4.

Notice of motion.

5.

Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Custody certificate has been filed in the Court today, which is taken on record. Learned State counsel vehemently opposes the Renu Rawat 2025.05.01 14:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-21681-2025 -2prayer for grant of regular bail to the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner caused injuries to the complainant with intention to kill him. He further submits that trial is pending for charge and is yet to commence. 6.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

7.

Keeping in view, that as per the MLR, injuries are blunt injuries and there is no opinion that injuries are dangerous to life; since the trial is yet to commence and the same is likely to take time, the fact that the petitioner is in custody for the last 06 months and continuous detention of the petitioner would not serve the ends of justice, I deem it a fit case to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner during the pendency of the trial. 8.

Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bonds, surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned.

9.

It is clarified that if on bail so granted through the instant order the applicant is found indulging in any other criminal case it shall be open to the State to seek cancellation of his bail.

(H.S.GREWAL) 30.04.2025 JUDGE renu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Renu Rawat 2025.05.01 14:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document