Vicky Thomas Alias Viky Thomas Singh v. Union Of India And Others

104 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11410 of 2024 Date of Decision:16.05.2024 Vicky Thomas @ Viky Thomas Singh ....Petitioner vs.

Union of India and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. S.K.Rattan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Krishna Dayama, Senior Panel Counsel for the Union of India Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents No. 3 and 4 to re-issue him passport.

2.

On being confronted with the fact that petitioner has applied for passport before Regional Passport Office, Mumbai, Mr. S.K.Rattan, Advocate submits that he confines his prayer to the extent that respondentState of Punjab may be directed to send police verification report with respect to FIRs registered in the State of Punjab. PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.05.16 04:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.11410 of 2024 -23. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab, who on advance notice is present in Court, submits that as and when information is sought by the competent authority, the report would be sent by the jurisdictional police authorities. 4.

Counsel for the petitioner agrees to the aforesaid arrangement. 5.

In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 16.05.2024 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.05.16 04:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document