High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/48513/2017disposed of

Toofan Singh v. State Of Haryana

2018-02-20Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-48513-2017 Date of decision: 20.02.2018 Toofan Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. R.S. Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana.

**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition that has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 293 dated 14.08.2017 under Sections 363, 366-A, 120-B, 126 IPC, registered at Police Station Murthal, District Sonepat.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that one Kajal i.e. the prosecutrix left her home voluntarily and approached this Court by filing CRM-M-35730-2017 titled 'Kajal vs. State of Haryana and others' seeking protection of her life and liberty from the hands of her parents and other relatives. Thereafter an FIR No. 293 dated 14.08.2017 under Sections 363, 366-A, 120-B, 126 IPC, came to be registered against one Toofan Singh, the petitioner herein, at Police Station Murthal, District Sonepat alleging that the said boy had allured and taken away the prosecutrix for the purpose of solemnizing a marriage. The matter was sent to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court and the parties have settled their dispute Satyawan 2018.02.21 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-48513-2017 -2by an agreement settlement dated 28.11.2017. In the said settlement agreement the complainant was agreed that the proceedings in FIR No. 293 dated 14.08.2017 under Sections 363, 366-A, 120-B, 126 IPC, registered at Police Station Murthal, District Sonepat would not be pursued and, therefore, the petitioner herein prays for grant of anticipatory bail. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the settlement agreement arrived at between the parties. In view of the fact that the matter stands compromised between the parties, the arrest of the petitioner is stayed and the petition stands disposed of accordingly.

20.02.2018 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.

Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2018.02.21 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh