Jatinder Kaur And Another v. State Of Punjab And Others

CRWP-4092-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Sr. No.115 Case No. : CRWP-4092-2025 Decided On : April 25, 2025 Jatinder Kaur and another ....

Petitioners vs.

State of Punjab and others ....

Respondents CORAM :

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR.

* * * Present :

Mr. Harmanbir Singh Sandhu, Advocate with Mr. K. S. Dargan, Advocate for the petitioners.

* * * SUKHVINDER KAUR , J.

:

Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to provide protection of life and liberty to the petitioners, who have married against the wishes of private respondents No.4 to 9. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major, petitioner No.1 - Jatinder Kaur, aged 21 years and petitioner No.2 - Manpreet Singh, aged 23 years and have got married on 22.04.2025, against the wishes of their family members, arrayed as respondents No.4 to 9. The copies of 'Aadhaar Card' of petitioners (Annexures P-1 and P-2) have been placed on record. Copy of Marriage Certificate as well as the marriage photographs have also been placed on record as Annexures P-3 and P-4 respectively. MONIKA 2025.04.25 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-4092-2025 It has been further submitted that the private respondents are threatening to interfere in the marital life of the petitioners. Hence, they are seeking protection in that regard and have approached this Court by way of filing the instant petition.

Notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court Mr. Inderjeet Singh Ladher, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-State. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, the petition is disposed off with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 22.04.2025 (Annexure P-5) at the earliest and take necessary steps, if any required, in accordance with law, to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law.

April 25, 2025 (SUKHVINDER KAUR) monika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No.

MONIKA 2025.04.25 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document