High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/6333/2020disposed of

Ram Nath v. State Of Punjab And Others

2020-08-25Mr. Justice Jitendra Chauhan2 pages

CRWP-6333-2020 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6333-2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.08.2020 Ram Nath ...PETITIONER

Versus

State of Punjab and others ...RESPONDENTS CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN

Present:

Mr. Mohit Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Mehardeep Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

JITENDRA CHAUHAN J. (ORAL) The matter has been taken up through video-conferencing in the light of the pandemic COVID-19 situation and as per instructions. This criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondent Nos. 4 to 9 and a direction to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to investigate the matter on the representation dated 29.05.2020 (Annexure P-1) filed by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that at this stage he would be satisfied, if a direction is issued to respondent No. 2 to decide the representation dated 29.05.2020 (Annexure P-1) expeditiously. JYOTI 2020.08.25 03:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-6333-2020 -2Heard.

A complete set of paper book has already been handed over to learned State counsel.

In view of the above, without adverting to the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar (Mohali) to consider and decide the representation dated 29.05.2020 (Annexure P-1) within four weeks from the receipt of the certified copy of the judgment. In case, on consideration, the competent authority reaches to the conclusion that the benefit claimed by the petitioner is admissible to him, in such eventuality, the consequential relief be allowed to him, within a period of four weeks thereafter, in accordance with law. However, in case the competent authority feels that the relief claimed by the petitioner is not admissible or made out, in that case, a speaking order be passed in the matter. 25.08.2020 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) jyoti-II JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes No Whether Reportable :

Yes No JYOTI 2020.08.25 03:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document