← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/20989/2026allowed

Satwinder Singh v. State Of Punjab

2026-04-24Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20989-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 24.04.2026 Satwinder Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present :

Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab.

***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1.

Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.01 dated 30.01.2026, registered under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 as amended vide the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018, at Police Station Economic Offences Wing, Punjab, Vigilance Bureau, Ludhiana. 2.

Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in custody for about 3 months. The senior officer had made a demand through the petitioner not he himself and voice samples have already been taken on 22.04.2026. Challan has been presented on 25.03.2026, charges have not been framed and in all there are 32 PWs. He is not involved in any other case. 3.

The custody certificate dated 23.04.2026 filed by the learned State counsel is taken on record. As per the same, the petitioner is behind bars for 2 months and 20 days.

4.

Learned State counsel opposes the bail on the ground that there are specific allegations with regard to making demand and was caught red handed with Rs.32,000/-. He, however, is unable to controvert with regard to stage and petitioner being not involved in any other case.

5.

Heard.

6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in particular that the petitioner is in custody for 2 months and 20 days; not involved in any other case; challan stands presented on 25.03.2026, charges are yet to be framed and there are total 32 PWs; the trial is likely to take a considerable time, further incarceration of the petitioner would be violative of his right enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the present petition is allowed. 7.

The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail, subject to furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned, if not required in any other case and shall abide by the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

(ii) The petitioner will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witnesses.

(iii) The petitioner will appear before the trial Court on each and every date fixed, unless is exempted by a specific order of Court.

(iv) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which, he is an accused, or for commission of which he is suspected of.

(v) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly coerce, induce, threaten or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/ her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner.

(vi) The petitioner shall not in any manner misuse his liberty.

(vii) The petitioner shall furnish his address and mobile number by way of an affidavit to the trial Court and not change the same till conclusion of trial and if for any reasons, he seeks to change either of the aforesaid, it shall be done only with prior information to the learned trial Court.

(viii) The petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the trial Court.

(ix) The trial Court/Duty Magistrate may impose any other condition, as deemed appropriate while releasing the petitioner.

8.

It is made abundantly clear that in case there is any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the State shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail as

granted to the petitioner by this order.

9.

In view of the above, it is clarified that the observations made herein above are limited for the purpose of present proceedings and would not be construed as any opinion on the merits of the case and the trial would proceed independently of the aforesaid observations. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 24.04.2026 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No