Satyawan And ORS v. State Of Haryana




    
    

 ! Date of decision: 27th July, 2015  Satyawan and others

Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana

Respondent  "  #$  %
  %
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

None for the petitioners.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana.

 %
& $! Report dated 07.07.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sonipat has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Sarita and the accused persons namely Satyawan and Naveen, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

Heard.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, being a pure matrimonial dispute and in the light of contentions of the two sides that the parties after compromise are living together as husband RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.27 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   and wife would certainly go a long way in making their future lives better and remove the ill3will and hatred that had been created and in view of the law laid down in '()* %(*+, - %.)./  0*1)2 )*3 )*.,/4# 

!   4(5(*)6!  and '7068(*3/4 %(*+, )*3 .,/49 - %.)./  0*1)2 )*3 )*.,/4# 

: !   4(5(*)6!

&the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.98 dated 02.03.2015 registered at Police Station Rai, District Sonipat under Sections 307/323/328/498A/34 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed. The petition stands allowed in those terms.

 %
!   06;:&


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.27 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court