Anu Vijan v. Bank Of Baroda And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 13249 of 2019 Decided on : 20.05.2019 Anu Vijan . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

Bank of Baroda and others . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL PRESENT: Mr. Atul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) Prayer made in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking quashing of the impugned actions of the Bank, who has proceeded under the summary procedure of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 (in short 'the SARFAESI Act, 2002') and Rules of 2002. Further prayer has been made for issuing direction to the respondent-Bank not to proceed against the property and take physical possession of the same. 2.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies, which are available to her under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, in accordance with law. 3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to her, in accordance with law.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE May 20, 2019 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2019.05.22 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh