Suman Verma v. State Of Haryana & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-48711-2017 Date of decision: 20.12.2017 Suman Verma

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

*****

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR Present:- Mr. Shiva Khurmi, Advocate for the petitioner.

JAISHREE THAKUR, J.(ORAL) The instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a direction to the official respondent No. 2 to look into the representation dated 19.11.2017 (Annexure P-1) and take legal action against Shashi Bhushan, Ajay sons of Raghbir Singh, Kailash Devi w/o Raghbir Singh and Sunita sister of Shashi Bhushan. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if respondent No.2 be directed to look into the representation dated 19.11.2017 (Annexure P-1) and take action in accordance with law, in a time bound manner.

Notice of motion.

Mr.P.P. Chahar, learned DAG, Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Three copies of the petition be handed over to him by learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of the day failing which no action is called for. He submits that the representation dated 19.11.2017 (Annexure P-1) will be decided within a period of four weeks.

Satyawan 2017.12.22 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-48711-2017 -2Heard.

Without going into the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 19.11.2017 (Annexure P-1), within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order and take necessary action in accordance with law.

20.12.2017 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Satyawan 2017.12.22 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh