Sanjay And ANR v. Ut Of Chandigarh And ORS

CRM-M-8596 of 2015 (O&M)



   
  CRMM8596 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision:26.03.2015 Sanjay and another $.Petitioners

Versus

State of U.T. Chandigarh and others $.Respondents      




Present:

Petitioners present in person with Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate.



 1.

Heard.

2.

Notice of motion. Mr. G.S. Chahal, Public Prosecutor, U.T. Chandigarh, who is present in court, accepts notice on behalf of U.T. Chandigarh.

3.

Sanjay and Ravita Devi, husband and wife, have moved this Court seeking protection on the ground that they have married on 11.3.2015 against the wishes of their parents and relatives. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that the petitioners had moved an application (Annexure P4) before the Senior Superintendent of Police, U.T. Chandigarh to seek protection but no action has been taken by the Police.

5.

In this view of the matter, Senior Superintendent of Police, U.T. Chandigarh is directed to look into the application (Annexure P4) and if there is any substance in it, may proceed further, in accordance with law. 6.

The present order, however, shall not be deemed to be proof qua the factum/validity of their matrimonial alliance.   

             26.03.2015 ishwar   ISHWAR SINGH GARHWAL 2015.03.26 16:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document