Rakesh Kumar And ANR v. State Of Punjab & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8687-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 09, 2015 Rakesh Kumar and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Ms.Richa Sharma, Advocate for Mr.Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.P.S.Paul, DAG, Punjab.

Mr.M.K.Bhatnagar, Advocate for respondent No.2.

......

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that Sections 323 and 325, IPC, are compoundable offences, therefore, the parties may be relegated to appear before learned trial Court and move an application for compounding of the offences as per provisions contained in Section 320, Cr.P.C. Ordered accordingly.

October 09, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.10.13 11:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh