Satpal v. State Of Punjab & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRR No. 2017 of 2013 Date of Decision: 30.05.2024 Satpal ...Pe

oner

Versus

State of Punjab and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Advocate for the pe

oner.

Mr. Sukhdev Singh, A.A.G., Punjab.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Sta on Sec ons 06.02.2013 Vigilance Bureau, Ludhiana 7, 8, 13(2) of PC Act and 120-B IPC 1.

Seeking se>ng aside of order dated 14.05.2013 passed by CJM, Ludhiana, the pe

oner has come up before this Court by filing the present revision pe

on.

2.

Counsel for the pe

oner submits that the pe

oner has been acquiCed by the trial Court and the present pe

on has been rendered infructuous.

3.

Given above, the present pe

on is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 30.05.2024 Jyo Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti Sharma 2024.05.31 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh