High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/8750/2015disposed of

Pankaj Shukla v. State Of Punjab And ORS

2015-08-21Mr Justice Gurdev Singh2 pages

CRM-M-8750 of 2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8750 of 2015 Date of decision: 21.08.2015 Pankaj Shukla ........ Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ...... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.P. NAGRATH

Present:

Mr. S.N. Sharma, Advocate for Mr. G.B. Gilhotra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gurveer Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.

for respondents no. 1 to 4.

Mr. Sangram Singh, Advocate for Mr. Sumeet Goel, Advocate for respondent no. 5-CBI.

Mr. Sanjeev Duggal, Advocate for respondents no. 8 to 10.

Mr. Lovkesh Gupta, Advocate for respondent no. 11.

Ms. Neelam Singh, Advocate for respondent no. 13.

R.P. NAGRATH, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of direction to official respondents to transfer the inquiry into complaints of large level fraud facilitated by a Government Bank namely Bank of Baroda and also the involvement of private respondents resulting into huge fraud of crores of rupees, from local police to CBI or some independent agency.

Learned State counsel has filed the status report by way of affidavit of Sh. Manpreet Singh Dhillon, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division, Phagwara, District JITENDER KUMAR 2015.08.22 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-8750 of 2015 -2Kapurthala and the same be taken on record. Learned State counsel submits that as per status report, FIR No. 01 dated 02.05.2015 under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC has been registered against respondents no. 6, 7 and 12 at Police Station NRI Kapurthala. In view of the above, no further indulgence of this Court is required and the instant petition is disposed of as such. August 21, 2015 ( R.P. NAGRATH ) jk JUDGE JITENDER KUMAR 2015.08.22 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document