Uma Kumari And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS




    
      Date of decision: 6th July, 2015  Uma Kumari and another

Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

Respondents        
  
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

None for the petitioners.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3.

None for the remaining respondents.

 
!"

# Learned State counsel has placed on record reply by way of affidavit of Mr.Deepak Ghalawat, IPS, Assistant Superintendent of Police, Tauru on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 whereby statements of the petitioners as well as mother of petitioner No.2 (Annexures R1 to R3) have also been annexed, wherein they have stated that threat to their life and liberty does not persist and thus, the matter has been rendered infructuous.

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.06 17:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



 

 In view of the statement made on behalf of the State, the petition stands dismissed having been rendered infructuous. However, the petitioners are at liberty to approach this Court if the need so arises.

"

 
#   $%&'! 
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.06 17:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court