Nutun Through Her Husband v. State Of Haryana And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-48979 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 20, 2017 Nutun through her husband

...Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Mohit Rathee Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner Nutun through her husband has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against respondents State of Haryana and Suresh for quashing the FIR No.63 dated 14.03.2017 under Sections 109, 302 and 309 IPC, registered at Police Station Beri, District Jhajjar and consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on account of compromise dated 12.12.2017 arrived and executed between both the parties with mutual consent. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 543 has held that proceedings may not be quashed on the basis of compromise in henious and serious offences of mental depravity or offences like murder, rape, dacoity, etc. as such Vineet Gulati 2018.01.18 12:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh offences are not private in nature and have serious impact on society.

CRM No.M-48979 of 2017 -2In view of the nature and gravity of the offence and in view the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the FIR in the present case cannot be quashed on the basis of the compromise. Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.

December 20, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2018.01.18 12:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh