Anurag Sharma v. Union Territory, Chandigarh And Another

IN T THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ JAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-23073-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 21.04.2026 ANURAG SHAR RMA .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

ITORY, CHANDIGARH AND UNION TERRI D ANOTHER .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON N'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDE EP PANNU

Present:

Non Mr.

Mr.

for r ne for the petitioner.

Tapan Masta, A.P.P., U.T. Chan Anirudh Kaushal, Advocate respondent No.1.

ndigarh assisted by MANDEEP PAN NNU, J (ORAL) No o one has put in appearance on be ehalf of the petitioner despite the e case having bee en called twice. It appears th hat the petitioner is no longer r interested in purs suing the present petition.

Acc cordingly, the same is hereby dism missed for non-prosecution.

All p pending application(s), if any, al lso stand disposed of.

( (MANDEEP PANNU) 21.04.2026 himanshu JUDGE Whether speaking Whether reportab g/reasoned Yes/No ble Yes/No HIMANSHU 2026.04.22 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document