Ginny v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.21075 of 2026 Date of decision: 20.04.2026 Ginny

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present :- Ms. Rashika Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Vikramjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG, Punjab.

***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) CRM No.16664 of 2026 This is an application under Rule 3(i) of Chapter 6 Part B Volume 5 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders seeking exemption from filing Roll of Advocate.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

CRM-M No.21075 of 2026 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner intends to withdraw the present petition.

2.

Permitted to do so.

3.

Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) 20.04.2026 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No NEETU RANI 2026.04.20 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD