Sunil And ORS v. State Of Haryana And ANR
Date of decision: 29th May, 2015 Sunil Kumar and others
Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another
Respondents 1.
Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.
Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present:
None for the petitioners.
Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana.
!"
# Report dated 17.04.2015 of learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.)7 cum7Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Hansi has been received whereby the complainant Rachna has shown her inclination to proceed ahead into the matter as per law.
Since in spite of repeated pass7overs none has come present on behalf of the petitioners, in view of the matter having been rendered infructuous, the same stands dismissed as such. "
# $%! RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.29 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court