High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/49166/2017disposed of

Preety And ANR v. State Of Punjab And Others

2017-12-21Mrs Justice Daya Chaudhary1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-49166 of 2017 Date of Decision: 21.12.2017 Preety and another ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: - Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been made for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 and 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from respondents No.5 to 8. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the purpose would be achieved if respondent No.2 - Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, is directed to look into representation (Annexure P-2) moved by the petitioners, in a time-bound manner.

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and after perusing the paper-book, but without commenting on merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 - Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, to look into the matter and get decided the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-2) by himself or through some subordinate to him, after hearing the petitioners by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

(RAMENDRA JAIN) December 21, 2017 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Ravinder Singh 2017.12.21 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Whether Reportable Yes/No