Govind Preet Singh v. Icici Bank Ltd And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-11653-2026 Date of Decision:17.04.2026 GOVIND PREET SINGH ...PETITIONER

VERSUS

ICICI BANK LTD AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI

Present:

Mr. Simran US, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. D.K. Singhal, Advocate for the respondent-ICICI Bank.

*** SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) 1.

Primary challenge of the petitioner is to order dated 19.03.2026, Annexure P-11, passed under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act. 2.

Counsel for the petitioner has contended that order is defective as the procedure prescribed under the Act as well as rules has not been followed. It is also his contention that Chief Judicial Magistrate has been misled into passing the impugned order.

3.

Be that as it may, remedy available to petitioner to assail order, Annexure P-11, is before the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act.

4.

Writ petition is not maintainable and is dismissed as such. 5.

Liberty is given to petitioner to take recourse to the remedy available to him in accordance with law.

(SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE 17.04.2026 (VIKAS SURI) sheetal JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SHEETAL 2026.04.20 13:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh