← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/25716/2023allowed

Sandeep Singh v. State Of Punjab And Another

2024-03-06Mr. Justice Alok Jain2 pages

-12024:PHHC:032641 CRM-M-25716-2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (271) CRM-M-25716-2023 Date of Decision:-March 06, 2024 Sandeep Singh ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and Another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN ****

Present:

Mr. A.S. Gagrha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Singh Bhatta, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Sahil Soi, Advocate for respondent No. 2. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1.

The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 122 dated 15.04.2023, under Sections 452, 323, 294, 506, 148 and 149 of Indian Penal Code at Police Station Sohana, District SAS Nagar (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 12.05.2023 (Annexure P-2).

2.

Keeping in view the fact that the parties entered into a compromise, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 30.11.2023 directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court for getting their statements recorded in that regard. Pursuant thereto, a report dated 31.01.2024 has been received from the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, SAS Nagar, stating that the compromise arrived at between the parties is voluntary and the same is without any pressure, coercion or undue influence.

PARUL 2024.03.11 12:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

-22024:PHHC:032641 CRM-M-25716-2023 3.

Learned State Counsel and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 admit the factum of compromise and submit that they have no objection to quashing of the FIR on that basis. 4.

Perusal of the aforesaid report establishes that the parties have amicably settled their dispute, and continuance of criminal proceedings in such a situation will be an exercise in futility, as the chances of ultimate conviction are bleak. The power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be exercised in such matters. It has been held by Supreme Court of India in cases Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another 2012(10) SCC 303 and Narinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another 2014(6) SCC 406 that criminal cases having overwhelmingly civil character, particularly those arising out of commercial transactions or matrimonial relationships or family disputes, should be quashed when the parties have resolved their disputes among themselves in a bona fide manner. 5.

Consequently, this petition is allowed. FIR No. 122 dated 15.04.2023, under Sections 452, 323, 294, 506, 148 and 149 of Indian Penal Code at Police Station Sohana, District SAS Nagar (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed qua the petitioner, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 25,000/- to be deposited by the petitioner and Rs. 25,000/- to be deposited by respondent No.2 within one month from today in Poor Patients Welfare Fund, PGIMER, Chandigarh.

(ALOK JAIN) JUDGE March 06, 2024 Parul Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No PARUL 2024.03.11 12:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document