Ajay Kumar v. State Of Haryana And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24054 of 2020 Date of decision: 24.08.2020 Ajay Kumar .....Petitioner vs.
State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: - Mr. Vivek Gupta, Advocate, for Mr. Parshant Sethi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sumit Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
Mr. Sunny Bhardwaj, Advocate.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Case has been taken up for hearing through videoconferencing due to Covid-19 pandemic. Mr. Sunny Bhardwaj, Advocate, has filed vakalatnama on behalf of Sham Sunder and Raj Kumar, on his own, though they have not been impleaded as party. Same is taken on record. Be tagged at appropriate place.
After arguing for some time, when the Bench was not agreeing with his submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition. Dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ramendra Jain) August 24, 2020 Judge R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2020.08.24 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document